|
|
it is difficult to give money, but we have to create affirmative action policies. People were deprived of education, property and freedom. When the republican game began, these people were not on an equal footing, they did not have complete citizenship, even if they were free. Public schools were predominantly for white people. Society can be hypocritical: “that was in the past, it happened. Although I am a beneficiary, I have nothing to do with it.” Or say: “I want to be a morally sustainable society and therefore we have responsibilities for what has benefited us”. ConJur — What do you think about the creation of a fund to .
compensate for diffuse rights? Oscar Vilhena — I think it’s very positive. Legal, collective actions of diffuse interest can correct the system that has perpetrated that type of violation. When we file collective actions for compensation for torture at Febem, part of this goes to the victims. The other part is a kind of Phone Number List sanction to the State, so that it does not continue carrying out that practice. This resource will be made available to correct that or other violations of rights. This demonstrates that the object of the action is not merely selfish, but rather the reconstruction of a public policy and the change in practices that lead to systematic violations. ConJur — And when the mayor of São Paulo orders the.
underside of the city's bridges to be closed to prevent homeless people from building their homes there? How is that? Oscar Vilhena — Living under the bridge is not a problem, but looking at it is terrible. There is one State, but there are several governments. When we are talking about accountability, we are saying that the State is responsible for the mistakes made by previous governments. And we are talking about an intergenerational pact from the government of the 19th century to the government of the 21st century. And the State is the same and will have to repair the bad things done by a government back there.
|
|
发表于 2024-1-11 12:49:37